Bookwizard wrote: |
I was not fully aware that they had created a "unified" string theory, but that is not the point, I use the term loosely just to spark more thought and widen the field of possible reasoning for this particular subject. Speaking of which... any thoughts? |
Bookwizard wrote: |
Why is it no one ever understands moral dilemmas! The point is not to find all the faults in the logic you can, but rather to analyze the specific implications that the dilemma is presenting. |
Quote: |
Why is it no one ever understands moral dilemmas! The point is not to find all the faults in the logic you can, but rather to analyze the specific implications that the dilemma is presenting. |
Shady Stoat wrote: |
... The idea of three or four people sitting around in a committee meeting, discussing the relative merits of one life against many, or in specific, the quality of one life versus the quality of the rest put together, is laughable... |
Tikanni Corazon wrote: |
it is wrong |
Angeal PureHeart wrote: |
I will have to dissagree with that one Pope. To some extent there IS a difference in "Wrong" or "Right" that 90% of humans understand. For instance. It is "Wrong" to kill someone. I am guessing that MOST of us will agree with that statement. It is "Right" to save someones life when you have the ability to do so. (Not including those who signed a DNR) Again I am guessing that MOST of us will agree with that statement. So yes, to an extent it is all based on someones own beliefs, opinions, and hearts. But there are a few standards. |
output generated using printer-friendly topic mod. All times are GMT - 8 Hours