THOR!!!
Select messages from
# through # FAQ
[/[Print]\]

City of IF -> Hall of Debate

#1: THOR!!! Author: ThunderbirdLocation: Rising from the ashes PostPosted: Sat May 07, 2011 9:06 pm
    —
Ok, just got back from one of the most wicked movie-going experiences EVER!

3d technology has come a very long ways... I haven't deigned to try it recently until this most recent Marvel release. And what a powerful delivery of this now well developed presentation style. Not only was this movie absolutely exceeding all expectations, but the imagery was absolutely stunning, mind-boggling in 3d!

If you were debating whether to take a trip to the theaters for this one, debate no further... GO!

Sorry... I don't normally start topics like this but I am so JAZZED I can't help it!

#2:  Author: Guest PostPosted: Sat May 07, 2011 10:08 pm
    —
So, is it that story about killing the dragon?

#3:  Author: ThunderbirdLocation: Rising from the ashes PostPosted: Sat May 07, 2011 10:14 pm
    —
No... Thor is a Marvel superhero derived from Norse mythology. I could go on a complete rant about connections between Norse and other mythologies, parallels and such (trust me... my head is really working that puzzle tonight after watching the movie...) but that's not my point. My point is simply that the movie is awesome!

#4:  Author: Guest PostPosted: Sat May 07, 2011 10:47 pm
    —
Smile Ok, I haven't been to a 3D theater for a longtime... Razz I just know the normal ones the most.

#5:  Author: D-LotusLocation: Hollywood, USA PostPosted: Sat May 07, 2011 11:05 pm
    —
Last movie I watched in theaters (Sucker Punch) scarred me: it completely neglected any of the traditional skills such as acting, plotline, or human drama. So I'm a bit wary. Are the visuals all that good? From what I've seen, it doesn't seem that much different from Iron Man or any superhero movie. How is Thor unique?

#6:  Author: ThunderbirdLocation: Rising from the ashes PostPosted: Sat May 07, 2011 11:08 pm
    —
Well, the visuals are astounding. Perhaps the best I've ever seen.

The downside is it missed the mark on some of the interpersonal connections. But it was a pretty good story nevertheless.

#7:  Author: HalfEmptyHeroLocation: Where rolls the Oregon, and hears no sound PostPosted: Sun May 08, 2011 2:55 am
    —
I actually walked out of this close to mid movie Laughing It wasn't that I hated the movie, it was just that it wasn't great and I really didn't feel like watching a movie at the time. I'm not sure why I went in the first place, and I must admit it was starting to get better (the beginning was terrible) but I couldn't justify staying any longer. I can be weird like that with movies though, so I wouldn't go off my judgement.

#8:  Author: Vishal MuralidharanLocation: City Of IF! PostPosted: Sun May 08, 2011 7:37 am
    —
*scribbles THOR in his notepad*

Isn't Thor the Norse god of lightning? The last movie I saw in theatre was a tamil film called KO and it was so terrific that I bought a CD (illegal.. i know) on my way home and watched it again.

I'll see this one!!!!

#9: I think..... Author: PopeAlessandrosXVIIILocation: Surrounded by many beautiful naked men PostPosted: Mon May 09, 2011 2:09 am
    —
I like Thor from Mythical Detective Loki Ragnarok.....If you like norse mythos, you should check it out Thunder-kun! It's....aaaaccurate, to a point. It just has a slightly different take on...several points... It makes the banishment rather more tolerable, is the best way I can put it...

Anyway, if I make it out of county to an actual movie theater, I'll drop in and check it out. Thnx for the heads up!

#10:  Author: Angeal PureHeartLocation: Escanaba, MI 49829 PostPosted: Sat May 21, 2011 9:25 am
    —
I watched that movie recently and I am glad that they had the Himedall right. According to the Norse Himedall was comepletely blind, guardian of the city, as well as God of Light, and Protection. He was indeed all of those things in this movie as well. I am very glad that they kept that part correct. I might have been upset if they did not. I know alot more about Norse Mythology than people think I do.

#11:  Author: BookwizardLocation: Gallifrey PostPosted: Thu Jun 09, 2011 4:06 pm
    —
It certainly exceeded my expectations, though I did have pretty low ones. I have not really gotten into this whole comic-movie craze that I think was started by the success of Iron-Man...


#12:  Author: Kalyssa SummersLocation: RL: NJ, USA | Starving Peasant for Posts in City of IF *Reaches for your Story Hungrily* PostPosted: Thu Jun 09, 2011 7:05 pm
    —
Boyfriend coming over in 11 days....is THOR going to be still out then?!!


Laughing he's the only one with the money to take me out to a movie....

#13:  Author: ThunderbirdLocation: Rising from the ashes PostPosted: Thu Jun 09, 2011 8:21 pm
    —
Quote:
this whole comic-movie craze that I think was started by the success of Iron-Man...

It was planned since the success of the Spider Man and X-men movies I think. They meant for this from the beginning with Iron Man - that Iron Man, the Hulk (the newer re-released version), Thor, and the soon to arrive Capt'n America to lead into the Avengers next summer.

#14:  Author: LilithLocation: Happily curled up in a Daemon's lap PostPosted: Fri Jun 10, 2011 7:38 pm
    —
YAYNESS! Saw Thor when I was on vacation in the UK and it was AWESOME. With the exception of the love interest in it. I think it was too rushed, too forced, and to be honest? She was kinda pathetic.

But I quite enjoyed the Norse God(s).

#15:  Author: ThunderbirdLocation: Rising from the ashes PostPosted: Fri Jun 10, 2011 9:58 pm
    —
Lilith wrote:
YAYNESS! Saw Thor when I was on vacation in the UK and it was AWESOME. With the exception of the love interest in it. I think it was too rushed, too forced, and to be honest? She was kinda pathetic.

But I quite enjoyed the Norse God(s).


Yeah, their failings there was the one thing that cut the movie at the knees with the critics. The relationship was most certainly not established well enough to warrant such a deep connection. Much agreed. But yeah, it didn't really matter in light of all the positive things going on there.


I just got back from the new Pirates movie and gotta say, the mermaids were depicted amazingly - true vision for the creatures. And the plotwork is everything as excellent as what we've come to expect from the franchise. But it admittedly wasn't quite as good as the first three, though the story developing may end up just as good if not better.

#16:  Author: Kalyssa SummersLocation: RL: NJ, USA | Starving Peasant for Posts in City of IF *Reaches for your Story Hungrily* PostPosted: Fri Jun 10, 2011 10:46 pm
    —
Thunderbird wrote:
Lilith wrote:
YAYNESS! Saw Thor when I was on vacation in the UK and it was AWESOME. With the exception of the love interest in it. I think it was too rushed, too forced, and to be honest? She was kinda pathetic.

But I quite enjoyed the Norse God(s).


Yeah, their failings there was the one thing that cut the movie at the knees with the critics. The relationship was most certainly not established well enough to warrant such a deep connection. Much agreed. But yeah, it didn't really matter in light of all the positive things going on there.


I just got back from the new Pirates movie and gotta say, the mermaids were depicted amazingly - true vision for the creatures. And the plotwork is everything as excellent as what we've come to expect from the franchise. But it admittedly wasn't quite as good as the first three, though the story developing may end up just as good if not better.



*envy*

#17:  Author: Vikas Muralidharan PostPosted: Sat Jun 11, 2011 5:42 am
    —
Kalyssa Summers wrote:
Boyfriend coming over in 11 days....is THOR going to be still out then?!!


Laughing he's the only one with the money to take me out to a movie....


As soon as I read the first sentence, I started frantically searching for the word "money" Razz

*Girls, I tell you* Razz

ROFL, go for it. Its a freaking awesome movie.

#18:  Author: The White Blacksmith PostPosted: Sun Jun 12, 2011 2:25 am
    —
Is it as good not in 3D? People have said that the 3D is amazing, but does the actual film stand on its own?

#19:  Author: LordoftheNightLocation: Hell PostPosted: Sun Jun 12, 2011 3:20 pm
    —
I actually felt the 3D just detracted from the film. Unless a film is specifically designed for 3D, it's just a fairly useless gimic. There's only been two films that I know of, where the 3D actually made a big improvement. Everything else, it's fairly pointless.

#20:  Author: LilithLocation: Happily curled up in a Daemon's lap PostPosted: Mon Jun 13, 2011 4:58 pm
    —
LordoftheNight wrote:
I actually felt the 3D just detracted from the film. Unless a film is specifically designed for 3D, it's just a fairly useless gimic. There's only been two films that I know of, where the 3D actually made a big improvement. Everything else, it's fairly pointless.


I concurr, with the exception that I think it only worked for Tron: Legacy. Which I quite enjoyed* as well.




*......I think I'm suddenly realizing movies with shirtless boys are automatically in the like column. Crap.

#21:  Author: The White Blacksmith PostPosted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 12:52 am
    —
Lilith wrote:

*......I think I'm suddenly realizing movies with shirtless boys are automatically in the like column. Crap.


One word: Twilight.

#22:  Author: LordoftheNightLocation: Hell PostPosted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 1:35 am
    —
Lilith wrote:
LordoftheNight wrote:
I actually felt the 3D just detracted from the film. Unless a film is specifically designed for 3D, it's just a fairly useless gimic. There's only been two films that I know of, where the 3D actually made a big improvement. Everything else, it's fairly pointless.


I concurr, with the exception that I think it only worked for Tron: Legacy. Which I quite enjoyed* as well.


Tron would be one of those two films. And it worked, because the 3D bits were shot in 3D, as opposed to being editted later.


Last edited by LordoftheNight on Tue Jun 14, 2011 3:16 am; edited 1 time in total

#23:  Author: Kalyssa SummersLocation: RL: NJ, USA | Starving Peasant for Posts in City of IF *Reaches for your Story Hungrily* PostPosted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 2:55 am
    —
LordoftheNight wrote:
Lilith wrote:
LordoftheNight wrote:
I actually felt the 3D just detracted from the film. Unless a film is specifically designed for 3D, it's just a fairly useless gimic. There's only been two films that I know of, where the 3D actually made a big improvement. Everything else, it's fairly pointless.


[color=darkblue]I concurr, with the exception that I think it only worked for Tron: Legacy. Which I quite enjoyed* as well.


Tron would be one of those two films. And it worked, because the 3D bits were shot in 3D, as opposed to being editted later.


Tron was fun! We watched in in the giant IMAX in San Francisco.

Vikas wrote:
As soon as I read the first sentence, I started frantically searching for the word "money" :Razz:

*Girls, I tell you* :Razz:


Hey! Poke I deserve men who spoil me! And dunn' slam a girl for bein' relatively poor! Razz

#24:  Author: Vikas Muralidharan PostPosted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 7:13 am
    —
Kalyssa Summers wrote:

Vikas wrote:
As soon as I read the first sentence, I started frantically searching for the word "money" :Razz:

*Girls, I tell you* :Razz:


Hey! Poke I deserve men who spoil me! And dunn' slam a girl for bein' relatively poor! Razz


Yeah...right.. Okay Razz

#25:  Author: LilithLocation: Happily curled up in a Daemon's lap PostPosted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 8:06 am
    —
The White Blacksmith wrote:
Lilith wrote:

*......I think I'm suddenly realizing movies with shirtless boys are automatically in the like column. Crap.


One word: Twilight.


Sorry, should I clarify and say HUMAN MEN?! *hates Twilight*
Kalyssa Summers wrote:
LordoftheNight wrote:
Lilith wrote:
LordoftheNight wrote:
I actually felt the 3D just detracted from the film. Unless a film is specifically designed for 3D, it's just a fairly useless gimic. There's only been two films that I know of, where the 3D actually made a big improvement. Everything else, it's fairly pointless.


I concurr, with the exception that I think it only worked for Tron: Legacy. Which I quite enjoyed* as well.


Tron would be one of those two films. And it worked, because the 3D bits were shot in 3D, as opposed to being editted later.


Tron was fun! We watched in in the giant IMAX in San Francisco.

Vikas wrote:
As soon as I read the first sentence, I started frantically searching for the word "money" :Razz:

*Girls, I tell you* :Razz:


Hey! Poke I deserve men who spoil me! And dunn' slam a girl for bein' relatively poor! Razz



[color=darkblue]*coughs and hides the fact I sign my own paycheck each week*

#26:  Author: Kalyssa SummersLocation: RL: NJ, USA | Starving Peasant for Posts in City of IF *Reaches for your Story Hungrily* PostPosted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 4:14 pm
    —
Lilith wrote:

I concurr, with the exception that I think it only worked for Tron: Legacy. Which I quite enjoyed* as well.


What's Tron Legacy?

Lilith wrote:

Vikas wrote:
As soon as I read the first sentence, I started frantically searching for the word "money" :Razz:

*Girls, I tell you* :Razz:


Hey! Poke I deserve men who spoil me! And dunn' slam a girl for bein' relatively poor! Razz



[color=darkblue]*coughs and hides the fact I sign my own paycheck each week*
[/quote]

*envious of Lilith* That's where I"m going to at some point! Smile Smile

#27:  Author: Cremuex LevierLocation: Armidale, Australia PostPosted: Tue Jan 31, 2012 9:11 am
    —
As much as I love Thor (Loki just needs a big hug) as a movie, I could seriously do without the 3D which we don't get in the town that I reside in. However other 3D movies that I've seen have been triggers to migraines and I try to avoid them. I don't think you actually lose any quality of the movie if you don't watch it in 3D. All the story is still there it just doesn't pretentiousness try to do what the 80s did better. I quite prefer the red and blue glasses to the new black ones.



City of IF -> Hall of Debate


output generated using printer-friendly topic mod. All times are GMT - 8 Hours

Page 1 of 1

Powered by phpBB © 2001,2002 phpBB Group